Chapter 11:
Power in Intimate Relationships
Social Power
• Social
power is the ability to influence
the behavior of others and resist their
influence on us.
Power as a Social Exchange Process
• The
Bases of Power
• The
Process of Power
• The
Outcome of Power
The Bases of Power
• From
a social exchange perspective,
power is based on the control of valuable resources.
• A
powerful person does not need
to have direct control over these resources:
indirect control can be sufficient.
• But,
power based on resources requires that the person over whom power is held
values the resource.
The Bases of Power (continued):
• Resource
power also depends on the availability of alternative sources of the
resource.
• The
greater one's alternatives, the less dependent one is on any one person and the
less power any one person has over one.
• In
a dyadic relationship, power and dependency are inversely related:
•
The one who is more
dependent has less power.
The Bases of Power (continued):
• Many
different types of resources can serve as the basis for many different types of
power.
• The
social norms within a culture also affect power.
• These norms may directly allocate power in the
society, or they may indirectly distribute power through cultural beliefs about
what is valuable in the society.
Types of Resource Power:
The Bases of Power (continued):
•
Resource-based power does not necessarily operate the same way for both men
and women.
•
Traditionally, it has
been expected that men would base their power on money and status, while women
would base their power on love and sex.
•
If power is based on
different resources, can power be equal?
•
To answer this question,
we must consider whether the resources are equally valued, equally easy to
exchange across various social interactions, and equally under control of the
individual basing his or her power on it.
The Process of Power
•
The process of power
refers to the way that power is expressed.
•
Our use of language may
be a subtle means of expressing power.
•
For example,
interrupting someone is usually associated with having greater social power,
and males tend to interrupt females more than vice versa.
•
The role of touch in
expressing power is less clear, as touch can express dominance or solidarity.
The Process of Power (continued):
• Men
and women man use different power strategies.
• Some
research as found that in heterosexual relationships, men are more likely to
employ power styles that are direct and, while women are more likely to use
indirect styles.
• Not
all research, however, has obtained this gender difference.
The Process of Power (continued):
•
In one study, the power
styles of women were found to be more confined to stereotypically feminine
tactics, while men appeared to have
more freedom to use a wider variety of power styles--masculine and feminine.
•
When men and women use
nontraditional power styles, they may find themselves liked less than those who
use the power styles traditionally associated with their gender.
The Process of Power (continued):
• Women
who speak in an assertive manner are respected more by both male and female
listeners.
• Male
listeners, however, are more influenced by a tentative female speaker than by
an assertive one.
The Outcome of Power:
•
The outcome of power can
have different levels:
•
Orchestration power refers to the authority to decide who will decide;
•
Implementation power refers to the actions taken once power has been
delegated.
The Outcome of Power (continued):
•
Research on decision
making by husbands and wives has been criticized by some for overestimating the
power of wives by mistaking implementation power for orchestration power.
•
On the other hand, it is
also possible that research, particularly that involving questionnaires, has
underestimated the power of wives, since both husbands and wives may give
stereotyped answers emphasizing the power of husbands.
The Outcome of Power (continued):
•
In estimating power in
an intimate relationship, there may be a general tendency for people to
overestimate the partner's power while underestimating their own.
•
It is clear, however,
that even today female dominance in a heterosexual relationship is less
acceptable to both parties than is male dominance.
•
Men are expected to take
the initiative and women to take the role of responder (traditional gender role
perspective).
The Outcome of Power (continued):
• Both
husbands and wives are more comfortable in either egalitarian or male-dominated
relationships than in female-dominated marriages.
• In
addition, it appears that heterosexual relationships in which the female
publicly displays dominance may be less enduring.
Power and Personality
• Individual
differences in the need for power have been defined in two different ways.
• One
approach defines need for power as reflecting concerns about weakness and has
found that single women have an especially high need for power.
• Another
approach defines need for power as an interest in strong, vigorous action that
produces strong effects on others.
Power and Personality (continued):
•
On the basis of this
definition of need for power, men and women have similar needs but may express
them differently.
•
In general, men's need
for power has more connections with their intimate relationships than women's
need for power.
•
Among men, those high in
need for power are less satisfied and less committed than those low in need for
power.
Power and Personality (continued):
•
Men high in need for
power when they were young were less likely to have wives with full-time
careers when they were thirty-something.
•
In addition, men high in
need for power may inflict more physical abuse on their female partners.
•
Men high in need for
power are also more likely than men low in need for power to engage in
"profligate behaviors" such as drinking and gambling; this
association is mot found for women.
Power and Personality (continued):
• It has been suggested that women are more likely
than men to express their need for power in socially constructive ways because
women are socialized, more than men, to be socially responsible.
Power and Understanding
• It
is widely supposed that the weak need to understand the strong:
• That
is, the one who has less power needs to understand the motives and desires of
the one who has more power in order to please and placate the more powerful
member of the relationship.
Power and Understanding (continued):
• If,
then, males are more powerful in heterosexual relationships than females, there
should be a positive association between female understanding of the male and
progress in the relationship.
•
This finding has been
obtained in a number of studies.
• Most
of these studies, however, failed to guard against an alternative
explanation:
the power of stereotypes.
Power and Understanding (continued):
•
UNDERSTANDING
STEREOTYPES:
•
If both a man and a
woman describe the man in a stereotyped manner, the woman will appear to
understand him.
•
This process accounts
for why randomly paired partners were found to be happier in their marriages
when the woman could predict the man's view of himself.
•
It is still not
understood, however, why agreement on the male stereotype and not on the female
stereotype distinguishes happy couples from unhappy ones.
•
More recent research
suggests that the gender difference in understanding may be a thing of the past.
Power and Violence
• According
to two national surveys conducted in 1975 and 1985, marital abuse has not
changed across the decade, and it remains high.
• Surprisingly,
a number of studies have indicated that wife-to-husband abuse is often higher
than husband-to-wife abuse.
•
WHY?
Give some possible explanations.
Power and Violence (continued):
•
It does appear that
women victims are more likely to suffer serious injury than are men victims.
•
Spouse abuse is
associated with experiencing stressful events, having a low socioeconomic
status, and growing up in a violent home.
•
In the cycle of family
violence, children who witness parental abuse are more likely as adults to be
involved in spouse abuse (as abuser or victim) and to abuse their own children.
Power and Violence (continued):
•
Why Do They Not Leave?
• Research
on spouse abuse indicates that victims are less likely to leave the
relationship when they do not have adequate economic resources and when they
have invested more (in terms of time and affection) in the relationship.
•
In addition, victims may
fear that if they try to leave, they will suffer even greater physical harm.
Power and Violence (continued):
•
Violence in Premarital Relationships!
•
Although different
studies have obtained different estimates, it is clear that physical violence
occurs in a large number of premarital relationships, especially between
co-habiting couples.
•
Sexual coercion, by
physical or psychological means, is also widespread.
•
More men than women
report having used sexual coercion, but both sexes seem more aware of having
been coerced by others than of their own coercive actions.
Chapter 9:
Social Power
THE END.