Chapter 8: LOVE
Throughout
history, romantic love has had little to do with marriage (de Rougemont, 1956).
More
recently, however, and especially in Western cultures, young adults insist on
romance and passion as conditions for choosing a spouse.
North
Americans use romance as a major reason to marry, although this is not the case
for many others around the world (Jankowiak & Fischer, 1992).
Should
romance and passion be used as reasons for marriage since there are different
types of love and passion and romance decline?
There
are no simple, clear-cut answers.
Love
is complex.
A Brief History of Love
Over the
years, attitudes toward love have varied on at least 4 dimensions:
Cultural
value: Is love a desirable or undesirable state?
Sexuality:
Should love be sexual or nonsexual?
Sexual
orientation: Should love involve homosexual or heterosexual partners?
Marital
status: Should we love our spouses or reserve love for others?
Different
societies have come up with different patterns of what love is or should be.
The
ancient Greeks, for example, regarded passionate attraction to another person
as a sign of madness having nothing to do with marriage.
For
the Greeks, the ultimate type of love was platonic, the nonsexual adoration of
a beloved and was epitomized by love between two men.
Roman Antecedents:
Romans also
viewed love as an undesirable madness, but they also saw it as a game
(game-playing love).
There was a
high divorce rate during the last century of the Roman Empire.
The
concept of courtly love which appeared in the twelfth century, required
knights to seek love as a noble quest, devoting themselves to an aristocratic
lady.
Courtly
love was very idealistic and elegant and explicitly adulterous the male was
expected to be unmarried and the female married to someone else!
Unlike
the age of courtly love, marriage in the Middle Ages was political and very
unromantic.
As the following
500 years passed, people came to associate love with passion, although it was
usually doomed.
In the
seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, the English and other Europeans began to
think of romantic love as having a happy ending.
Passion,
however, was not considered a requirement for marriage.
Even now,
the majority of people do not assume that romantic love is linked to marriage
(Xiaohe & Whyte, 1990).
The fact that most young adults in
America regard romantic love as an important part of marriage is probably due
to Americas emphasis on individualism and economic prosperity as well as a
lack of a caste system or ruling class.
Different Views of Love
Love is
madness.
Love has
little to do with marriage.
The best
love occurs among people of the same sex.
Love does
not need to include sexual contact.
Love is a
noble quest.
Love is
doomed.
Love can
have a happy ending.
Love and
marriage go together.
Types of Love
A woman
writing to an advice columnist once asked why her passion had disappeared after
marriage.
The
columnist responded that infatuation and love are two different things and
pointed out that love is characterized by communication, tolerance, care and
was much deeper than physical infatuation.
Do you
think there is a difference between romantic love and infatuation?
According
to a leading theory of love, the answer is yes.
The Triangular Theory of Love
Sternberg
(1986, 1987) proposed that different types of love are the result of a
combination of 3 building blocks:
Intimacy
Passion
Commitment
Intimacy
includes feelings of warmth, understanding, communication, support and sharing.
Passion
is characterized by physical arousal and desire. It is typically displayed by
sexual longing, but any strong emotional need satisfied by ones partner fits
the category of passion.
Commitment
includes devoting oneself to a relationship and maintaining it and is more
cognitive than emotional.
The heat
in a romantic, loving relationship is assumed to stem from passion, the warmth
from intimacy, while commitment reflects a cognitive decision, not involving
emotions at all.
According
to Sternberg, each of the three components is one side of a triangle that
depicts the love between two people.
Each
component (passion, intimacy, commitment) can vary in intensity forming
triangles of different shapes and sizes.
Numerous shapes
of triangles can occur, however, we will discuss examples of relatively pure categories of love.
It is
important to note that pure experiences of love like the ones we are going to
discuss are probably not routine in reality.
Pure Categories of Love:
Nonlove: real love exists only when intimacy,
passion, and commitment are present. Otherwise, the relationship is
superficial, casual, and uncommitted.
Liking: this occurs when intimacy is high but
passion and commitment are very low. Liking occurs in friendships. If, however,
a friend arouses passion or is terribly missed, then the relationship has
turned into something else.
Infatuation: strong passion in the
absence of intimacy or commitment results in infatuation. Sternberg (1987)
tells of his preoccupation with a girl he barely knew when he was in high
school. He realizes that what he felt was only passion, thus he was infatuated.
Empty
love:
this is commitment without intimacy or passion. In Western cultures, this is
evidenced in some marriages when the warmth and passion have faded, but spouses
do not want to part. In other cultures, however, empty love may be the first
stage in a relationship, such as in the case of arranged marriages.
Romantic
love: when high intimacy
and passion occur together, they result in romantic love. This kind of love is
a combination of liking and infatuation. Although people often become committed
to their romances, Sternberg argues that commitment is not a defining component
of romantic love. For example, a summer love affair can be very romantic even
though the lovers know it will end when the summer ends.
Companionate
love: intimacy and
commitment combine to form a close companion. Typically, partners work to
maintain a deep, long-term close friendship in companionate love. This is
epitomized by a long, happy marriage in which the couples youthful passion has
slowly faded away.
Fatuous
love: this is the result
of passion and commitment in the absence of intimacy. This type of love is
evidenced when two people marry quickly because of their overwhelming passion ,
but dont know each other very well. These types of lovers invest a lot in an
infatuation--- a risky enterprise.
Consummate
love: this type of love
results from the combination of intimacy, passion, and commitment. People who
experience this kind of love experience complete love. Although many people
seek this kind of love, Sternberg argues that it is difficult to maintain over
time.
According
to the triangular theory of love, the 3 components of love can change over
time, causing people to experience different types of love in a given
relationship (Sternberg, 1986).
Passion
seems to be the most variable of the 3 components.
While
the components of love are important aspects of relationships, different types
of love probably overlap in a more complicated way than the triangular theory
of love implies (Fehr, 1994).
Romantic, Passionate Love
If
anyone has ever told you I love you, but Im not in love with you they
most likely meant I like you and care about you, but I dont find you sexually
desirable (Myers & Berscheid, 1997).
The
triangular theory of love says that sexual attraction or passion is the
defining characteristic of romantic love (Regan, Kocan, & Whitlock, 1998).
Any
form of strong emotion (positive or negative) can influence your feelings of
romantic love.
Arousal
Hatfield
& Berscheid analyzed romantic love and proposed that passionate attraction
is rooted in:
physiological
arousal coupled with
the
belief that another person is the cause of your arousal.
Although the
relationship between arousal and love can be obvious, sometimes this two-factor
phenomenon can have a twist.
Misattributions and Excitation Transfer
Misattributions occur when we make mistakes in
interpreting our feelings.
An example
of a misattribution is called excitation transfer (Zillmann, 1978,
1984).
This occurs
when arousal caused by one stimulus combines with arousal from a second
stimulus, but the first stimulus is ignored.
For
example, researchers have found that mild fear combined with an attractive
person of ones preferred sex can sometimes elicit arousal (Dutton & Aron,
1974).
Although
misattribution and excitation transfer have been supported by research, they
are nevertheless limited.
The
passage of time can do away with excitation transfer and misattributions if
there is a long delay between initial arousal and an emotional response.
Another
limitation is that if one realizes the root of initial arousal (i.e. fear of
something) then one will not misattribute it to sexual arousal.
Response Facilitation
Others
have proposed that instead of misattributions, response facilitation accounts
for arousal.
This
occurs whenever arousal is present because no matter where it comes from or how
we interpret it, our predominant response to the situation will be energized.
So
for instance, even if one realizes that one is afraid in a particular
situation, the excitation alone will draw more attention to an attractive
other.
The Passionate Love Scale (Short Form)
pg. 229
This
questionnaire measures the passion component of romantic love and includes
statements like the following,
I would
feel deep despair if ____ left me.
I feel
happy when I am doing something to make ____ happy.
I want ____
physically, emotionally, mentally.
For me,
____ is the perfect romantic partner.
Thought
Romantic
partners likely think about each other in different ways than they think about
their friends.
Rubin
(1973) created a Love and Liking Scale that emphasizes what lovers are
thinking.
Themes
on the Love scale include intimacy, attachment, and caring.
The
Love scale portrays love as a complex, multifaceted experience involving giving
(caring) and taking (attachment).
Rubin
proposes that when we fall in love, we want to be with our partners because we
like the way they make us feel and because we care for them and want to protect
them.
Love for
our romantic partners is not only characterized by feelings of desire and care,
but also by their intensity and urgency.
For
example, we would do anything for our partners and be miserable
without them.
In contrast
to loving, liking is less intense.
An
interesting study found that as people think a lot about their partners, they
also tend to love them more and vice versa (Tesser & Paulus, 1976).
Judgments
we make about others also influence the way we feel about them.
Goodwin and
colleagues (1997) found that when men expected to go out on a date with a woman
they rated her work as better than when they did not expect to go out on a
date.
In a way,
love is blind because we find our lovers to be fascinating in ways our
friends and others are not.
Thoughts
about ourselves can also change when we fall in love.
Aron and
Aron (2000) suggest that love causes our self-concepts or our ideas about
ourselves to expand and change.
As a result
of experiencing new things and learning more about ourselves when we are in
love, our self-esteem rises (Aron et al., 1989).
Companionate Love
Companionate
love is a more settled state than romantic love and it can be characterized as
a comfortable, affectionate, trusting love for a likable partner, based on
deep friendship involving companionship and the enjoyment of common activities,
mutual interests, and shared laughter (Grote & Frieze, 1994).
While
this is nice, it may sound a little bland compared to the thrill of romantic
love.
Still,
hundreds of married men and womens most frequent response to why they thought
their marriages had lasted at least 15 years was that their spouse was their
best friend and because they liked their spouse as a person (Laurer &
Laurer, 1985).
It is
important to remember that pure examples of love are not very common, thus
companionate lovers can and do experience passion and romantic lovers can and
do feel commitment.
Nevertheless,
it is possible to divide two major types of love that frequently occur in the
US:
a love that
is full of passion and leads people to marry and
a love that
is full of friendship and underlies marriages that last a long time.
Styles of Loving
John Alan
Lee (1977, 1988) used Greek and Latin words to describe six styles of love that
differ in the intensity of the loving experience.
Eros---the erotic lover
searches for physical appearance and believes in love at first sight.
Ludus---the ludic lover is
playful and often has several partners at the same time.
Storge---the storgic lover
seek genuine friendships that lead to real commitment.
Mania---the manic lover is
demanding, possessive and feels out of control.
Agape---the apagic lover is
giving and selfless.
Pragma---the pragmatic lover
seeks for someone of the proper age, religion, career, etc.
It
may be more useful to think of the six styles of love as overlapping themes in
loving relationships.
Certain
styles have been correlated with particular types of relationships:
Eros and
agape are positively correlated with romantic love.
Ludus is
negatively correlated with romantic love.
Men tend to
score higher on ludus than women do.
Individual Differences in Love:
Attachment Styles
The secure,
avoidant, and anxious/ambivalent attachment styles identified in infancy and
childhood have been expanded in studies of adult relationships.
In
particular, people who had a secure style tended to be more trusting,
committed, and satisfied in their romantic relationships than avoidant or
anxious people (Simpson, 1990).
Researchers
found that in regards to romantic love, secure people tend to score higher on
intimacy, passion, and commitment than insecure people.
In general,
secure attachment is associated with richer experiences of romantic and
companionate love.
A New Conceptualization of Attachment
Bartholomew
came up with four categories of attachment style:
Secure easy
to become emotionally involved and is comfortable depending on others.
Preoccupied---
is uncomfortable being without close relationships but is worried about not
being valued enough.
Fearful---
is uncomfortable getting close to others and is not very trusting.
Dismissing---
is comfortable without close relationships and likes independence.
Individual Differences in Love:
Individual
differences are relatively enduring characteristics of individuals that
exert an influence across different situations.
These
individual differences include:
gender,
age, and
personality tendencies.
Gender and Love:
There are many
gender differences in love experiences:
Males
More Than Females:
Romanticism.
Falling
in love earlier in a relationship.
Ludus
love.
Females and males about
Equal:
Love
at first sight.
Passionate
Love.
Agape
and Eros types of love.
Looking
at each other.
Gender and Love (continued):
Females
More Than Males:
Liking.
Discriminating
among love, liking, and romanticism.
Frequency
of being in love.
Intensity
of romantic sensations.
More
vivid memories of past partners.
Idealization
of partner.
Finding
love rewarding.
Females More Than Males:
Experiences
of unrequited love.
Greater
liking leading to better recall of what partner said.
Storge,
Mania, and Pragma types of love.
Gender and Love (continued):
The
exact reasons for these gender differences are unknown.
Possibly,
they reflect a gender difference in what men and women are willing to report,
rather than actual gender differences in love experiences.
Perhaps
these findings indicate that love is more important to women than to men
because of socialization practices, economic concerns, or both.
Men and Women
Women,
on average, tend to experience stronger, more intense, and more volatile
emotions than men do (Brody & Hall, 1993).
Men
tend to have more romantic attitudes than women do and are more likely than
women to think that if you love someone nothing else matters (Sprecher &
Metts, 1989).
Women
are more selective and fall in love less quickly than men do (Kendrick et al.,
1990).
Men
tend to be less discriminating and accept casual sex more.
Over
time non-traditional couples may have greater companionate love for each other.
Age and Love:
It is
difficult to examine the influence of age on love because age is associated
with many other factors (such as having had more relationships and having had
relationships that lasted longer).
The
available research suggests the possibility that romanticism may have a
curvilinear association with age, decreasing at first and then increasing.
Age
Although it
is difficult to tell whether changes in relationships are due to age versus
experience and history, some evidence has been found for changes in
relationships as a function of age.
In general,
it seems that older people replace urgent, intense passion with more humor and
a more mature outlook on love.
Personality and Love:
The
role that self-esteem plays in people's love experiences has received a great
deal of attention.
It
now appears that people low in self-esteem do not react more positively to
friendly overtures than do those high in self-esteem.
The
evidence for the matching hypothesis (that people would be more attracted to
those with a similar level of self-esteem) is mixed.
Personality and Love (continued):
Dion
and Dion have conducted a series of studies on the relationship between love
and various personality factors--including (1) self-esteem, (2)
internal-external control, (3) defensiveness, and (4) self-actualization.
Their
research suggests an important distinction between the confidence to pursue
love relations and the need for these relations.
High
levels of self-esteem, personal security, and independence appear to contribute
to the former, while lower levels contribute to the latter.
Does Love Last?
The harsh
truth is that, in general, romantic love decreases after people marry (Sprecher
& Regan, 1998).
After just
two years of marriage, spouses express affection only half as often as they did
when they were first married (Huston & Chorost, 1994)!
Worldwide,
divorces occur more often in the fourth year of marriage than any other time
(Fisher, 1995).
Why Doesnt Romantic Love Last?
Several
reasons may be responsible for the decline in romantic love over time (Walster
& Walster, 1978).
First,
fantasy enhances romance.
Lovers
tend to idealize their partners, at least until reality settles in.
Novelty
also enhances excitement to new lovers.
Arousal
fades as time passes.
Overall,
the passionate component of love fades more quickly than intimacy or commitment
(Acker & Davis, 1992).
So What Does the Future Hold?
Often, the
love that leads people to marry is not the love that keeps them together
decades later. However, this is not necessarily bad news.
Companionate
love is more stable than romantic love (Sprecher & Regan, 1998) and those
who experience this kind of love express satisfaction in their relationships.
What
does this suggest?
Enjoy
passion, but dont make it the foundation of your relationship.
Nurture
a friendship with your lover.
Grab
every opportunity to enjoy novel adventures with your spouse.