Coping: efforts to master, reduce, or tolerate the
demands created by stress
General points about coping
People cope with stress in different ways
Individuals have own styles of coping
Coping strategies vary in their adaptive value
Common coping patterns of limited value
Giving up
Learned helplessness: passive behavior produced
by exposure to unavoidable aversive events
Martin Seligman did early research on animal subjects
Originally viewed as a product of conditioning
But current view includes cognitive
interpretation of event as factor
Belief that events are beyond your control is
important element of current model
Generally not viewed as positive method of coping
Associated with increased distress
Can contribute to depression
Social withdrawal is related strategy
Giving up may be adaptive in some situations, particularly
if goals are unrealistic
Striking out at others
Aggression: any behavior intended to hurt
someone, either physically or verbally
Aggression may be displaced onto substitute target
Freud suggested aggression can produce catharsis: a
release of emotional tension
Thus, aggression can be adaptive, according to Freud
But recent research indicates that aggression does not
reliably lead to catharsis
Indulging yourself
Evidence relating stress to increases in eating, smoking,
drug consumption
Recent manifestation is Internet addiction, which consists
of spending an inordinate amount of time on the Internet and inability to
control online use
Strategy can have merit if kept under control, but
excesses generally result in negative consequences
Blaming yourself
When confronted with stress, people may become
self-critical
Albert Ellis calls this catastrophic thinking and suggests
that it is rooted in irrational assumptions
Recognizing one's weaknesses has some value, but
negative self-talk is generally counterproductive
Can contribute to development of depression
Defensive coping
Nature of defense mechanisms
Defense mechanisms are largely unconscious
reactions that protect a person from unpleasant emotions such as anxiety
and guilt
Protect against the emotional discomfort (e.g., anxiety)
elicited by stress
Generally work through self-deception
Typically operate at level of unconscious, but can
operate at varying levels of consciousness
Are entirely normal patterns of coping
Can illusions be healthy?
Generally, no
Operate as an avoidance strategy
Represent "wishful thinking" that accomplishes little
Repression has been found to relate to poor health
Use energy that could be directed more constructively
Some researchers suggest that illusions may be adaptive
for mental health
Others have expressed skepticism
Suggest that accuracy and realism are healthy
Report data showing that overly favorable self-ratings
are correlated with maladaptive personality traits
Contradictory findings may be due to researchers
defining illusions and mental health differently
The nature of constructive coping
Constructive coping refers to efforts to deal with
stressful events that are judged to be relatively healthfulUnrelated to "academic"
intelligence
Favorably related to mental and physical health, and to
measures of success
Constructive thinkers tend to create less stress for
themselves
What makes a coping strategy constructive?
Involves confronting problems directly
Based on realistic appraisals of one's stress and coping
resources
Involves learning to recognize potentially disruptive
emotional reactions to stress
Involves learning to exert control over potentially
harmful habitual behaviors
Appraisal-focused constructive coping
Albert Ellis's rational thinking
Rational-emotive therapy: an approach to therapy
that focuses on altering clients' patterns of irrational thinking to
reduce maladaptive emotions and behavior
Problematic emotional reactions are caused by
catastrophic thinking, which refers to unrealistic appraisals of
stress that exaggerate the magnitude of one's problems
Ellis explains his ideas using a three-step sequence
Activating event is any potentially stressful
transaction
Belief system is one's appraisal of the stress
Consequence is consequence of negative thinking,
which is typically emotional distress
Ellis suggests that the belief system is responsible for
causing the consequence
The roots of catastrophic thinking
Unrealistic appraisals of stress are caused by
irrational assumptions